Search for: "Roberts v. Sparks et al" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm by Gustavo Arballo
En 1975 Linda Spitler terminará demandando por daños al médico que la intervino, a su madre, al abogado que hizo la presentación, y al juez Stump, que alegó entonces la inmunidad.Así surge el otro gran caso de la Corte, "Stump v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
 Thus, Judge Sam Sparks felt the need to educate counsel in this matter when they could not agree on the scope of a third party subpoena: The utterly predictable result is shown below: It is a shame that so many lawyers believe that practicing law means unlearning everything we were taught in kindergarten. ***   Oracle v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]